Goals

• CDAP and CDAP Applications have the ability to withstand short and transient infrastructural outages

• During interruption of underlying services (one or more), CDAP or CDAP Applications can operate under degraded performance/limited

  functionalities Users will

  functionalities

• Users may not be able to do admin operations such as creating, updating, deleting namespaces, adding roles, granting privileges

• Users may not be able to perform operations like deploying apps, starting programs or new data or application lifecycle operations.

• However all the applications that are running, should be running

• Once interruption in the underlying service is resolved or services come back to normal operation, the CDAP and CDAP Application will go back to normal

  state 

  state

• Interruptions in service would be due to node failure, service failures or compatible rolling upgrades or downgrades in progress

• Does not include

  in-compatible

  incompatible upgrades or downgrades of underlying

  infrastructure 

  infrastructure

• Does not include long unavailability of service and infrastructure

Area of Focus

• CDAP system resiliency to infrastructure unavailability or

  interruption for long periods of time

  service interruptions  

• CDAP Application resiliency

• CDAP Rolling Upgrades

• CDAP Application Rolling Upgrades

• Underlying infrastructure rolling upgrades

High Level Requirements

• Compatible Upgrade or Downgrade of underlying infrastructure Hadoop components

• Underlying Hadoop infrastructure is either being upgraded or downgraded and the expectation is that CDAP and CDAP Applications should tolerate and be resilient to infrastructure services not being available during the upgrade or downgrade process.

 

• The whole upgrade or downgrade process could take anywhere between 30 mins - 18 hours or more.

 

• However, CDAP would expect intermittent service interruption caused by rolling restart instead of complete shutdown of the service throughout the entire upgrade/downgrade process that causes long unavailability of the service

• During the period of

service unavailability or interruption

• upgrade / downgrade , the CDAP and CDAP Applications operate in degraded mode.

• Hadoop infrastructure upgrade / downgrade has to be compatible with CDAP and CDAP Application

in order to have smooth upgrades

• In case

,

• there are issues during the upgrade, CDAP should be resilient to rollbacks

• CDAP and CDAP Applications

should also be able to withstand compatible downgrades

• will continue to run and will not require a restart after the upgrade is done.

• The compatibility matrix should be available to users to ensure smooth upgrades

• For HBase compatibility, it is at the HBase client level and not at the co-processor level

• Upgrade

  / Downgrade

  of CDAP

• Upgrade a CDAP version. Major and minor version could have different impacts. We will discuss about these impact further in the document.

 
Roll back

• Rollback of CDAP upgrade

or downgrade

• CDAP version

compatible

• compatibility matrix available to users

Dry run for upgrade and downgrade

• Rolling upgrade of CDAP

• Upgrade

  / Downgrade

  of CDAP Applications

• Upgrade or Downgrade a CDAP Application

• Rolling upgrade of live services like CDAP Services, Flow and Spark Streaming

• Downgrade of CDAP and CDAP Applications

Technical Breakdown

RS-001 :

Minimize interruption caused by update of

coprocessor

CDAP system uses few HBase coprocessors to optimize the operations being performed on HBase. When the underlying HBase is upgraded, the table has to be altered. This means that the table has it may requires upgrade to the coprocessors due to coprocessor API changes. Upgrading of coprocessor requires HBase tables to be disabled. Disabling the table can have multiple side effects on CDAP, so the recommended approach right now is to stop applications running within CDAP as well as CDAP. Ideally stopping of CDAP or CDAP applications shouldn’t be required. For each version of non-compatible HBase, CDAP has a compat module has to updatedrolling upgrade of CDAP, disabling of HBase tables shouldn’t be required.

RS-002 : Client

resiliency

CDAP as a system or CDAP Applications through CDAP APIs directly or in-directly connect with Kafka, HBase, HDFS, YARN, Zookeeper as well as other CDAP systems. All client APIs currently have a pre-defined predefined timeout before they fail. This behavior is not suitable for handle handling failures in underlying system. The clients should exhibit backoff back-off behavior wherever applicable in case of failures resulting in degraded behavior. Once the issue is resolved then client should immediately get back to normal operation.  CDAP will provide the impact and behavior of each program type when there is infrastructure outage.

RS-003 :

Make CDAP system services HA

All CDAP system services (such as Dataset service, TX manager, etc.) should support HA and have minimal failover time. Together with RS-002 client resiliency, CDAP and CDAP applications should be able to withstand any CDAP system services interruptions.

RS-004 : CDAP

version definition and guarantees of version

RS-005 : Rolling upgrade definition

RS-006 : Internal Schema Evolution and Management

RS-007 : Managing Infrastructure Incompatibility 

RS-008 : System state transition and management 

RS-009 : Apache Twill Application rolling upgrade 

RS-010 : Upgrade Orchestrator

RS-011 : Progressive background upgrade tool 

RS-012 : Hydrator Pipeline Upgrade 

RS-013 : Dataset Upgrade 

RS-014 : Test Framework and Chaos Monkey

CDAP version would have to provide strong guarantees. Things like change in major version might not support rolling upgrade, patch upgrades should be able to jump to any patch within minor version, Minor version upgrades. Handing of API deprecation, Beta and GA. Beta API contracts, would they affect rolling upgrade. What version component guarantee binary compatibility, source compatibility, wireformat compatibility. When does CDAP app need to be rebuilt. If they have to rebuilt, how the application should be upgraded.

RS-005 : Internal schema evolution and management

Most network endpoint are versioned, but they are not complete. All the internal schemas should versioned (schema hash concept) and support for compatible schema changes.

RS-006 : Managing infrastructure incompatibility

When underlying upgrade or downgrade creates incompatibility, the CDAP system and CDAP Applications should be able to handle transient incompatibilities service disruptions. This might be prevented with documentation and publishing of compatibility matrix, but the system still should be able to handle the impact.

RS-007 : System state transition and management

During the rolling upgrade process the system has to be transitioned from one state to the other. Different sub-systems could in different states and those need to be managed. This is also applicable not only to CDAP System, but also to CDAP Applications.  

RS-008 : Apache Twill Application rolling upgrade

In order to support rolling upgrade of CDAP Applications, capability needs to be added to Apache Twill Application.

RS-009 : Upgrade orchestrator

The whole upgrade process has to be co-ordinated across multiple sub-systems for CDAP system and components for CDAP Application. The orchestrator is responsible for managing the lifecycle of rolling upgrade, reporting the status of upgrade.

RS-010 : Progressive background upgrade tool

Rolling upgrade at times would involve transitioning data, metadata from one format to another, if this process has to be non-intrusive, then it should be implemented as progressive process.

RS-011 : Hydrator pipeline upgrade

Hydrator pipelines are currently not compatible across major, minor or bug fix release as they are tightly tied to the exact version. This should follow the same or similar guidelines RS-004.

RS-012 : Dataset upgrade

In some cases there might system dataset used by the CDAP system or user datasets that are part of CDAP Applications that need to be migrated during the upgrade process, so the system should be support upgrading both types of datasets as part of RS-010.

RS-013 : Test framework and chaos monkey

From platform perspective, there should exists a solid end-2-end testing framework for testing known scenarios, but a chaos monkey would provide a more comprehensive testing.

RS-014 : User Interface / REST APIs / CLI

There should exist the ability to initiate, manage, monitor and track the progress of rolling upgrades / downgrades. These are accessible through CDAP User Interface, REST API and Command Line Interface.

RS-015 : Support for rollbacks

In case of failure to upgrade or downgrade mid through the process, the RS-009 should have the ability to rollback and restore the state of the system to point before the start of the process.

RS-016 : Application Versioning

Support versioning of CDAP Application. The specification of the application is versioned and support for running simultaneous version of application is supported.

Open Item/Discussion point

• Define long and short/transient outages

• More information to gathered here to understand the length of outages.

 

• When outages are multiple hours, how should the system handle these.

• Rolling upgrades takes up to 6 hours. 

Action Items

• Oct 7th 2016

   Send

• Image Added Send supported HBase version by CDAP

• Gather information about CDH version compatibility

changes –

• changes – Talk to Cloudera and

compile 

• compile