...
- As a CDAP system, I should be able to integrate with Apache Sentry for fine-grained role-based access controls of select CDAP operations
- As a CDAP admin, I should be able to easily configure Sentry to work with CDAP on different type of cluster (ex: CDH, CM cluster etc).
- As a CDAP admin, I should be able to create/update/delete roles in Apache Sentry
- As a CDAP admin, I should be able to add users/groups to roles in Apache Sentry
- As a CDAP admin, I should be able to turn authorization on/off easily for entire CDAP instance
- As a CDAP system, I should be able to authorize the following requests
- Namespace create/update/delete
- Application deployment
- Program start/stop
- Stream read/write (Not Implemented in 3.4)
These operations are a subset that represents the various 'kinds' of operations allowed in CDAP
...
Entity | Sentry Resource URI |
---|---|
Instance | cdap:///instance=server1 |
Namespace | cdap:///instance=server1/namespace=ns1 |
Artifact | cdap:///instance=server1/namespace=ns1/artifact=art1art/artifactVersion=1 |
Application |
|
Program | cdap:///instance=server1/namespace=ns1/application=app1/programType=pt1/programName=prg1 |
Dataset | cdap:///instance=server1/namespace=ns1/dataset=ds1 |
Stream | cdap:///instance=server1/namespace=ns1/stream=s1 |
...
Property | Description | Value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
sentry.service.allow.connect | List of users allowed to connect to the Sentry Server | cdap will be added to this list | ||
sentry.cdap.provider | Authorization provider for the CDAP component in Sentry. This class defines the user-group mapping amongst other things. | org.apache.sentry.provider.common. HadoopGroupResourceAuthorizationProvider | ||
sentry.cdap.provider.resource | The resource for creating the Sentry Provider Backend. This property seems unused, and always defaults to "". However, all data engines (hive, sqoop, kafka define it). | "" | ||
sentry.cdap.provider.backend | A class that implements ProviderBackend . This class uses a SentryServiceClient to communicate with the sentry service from the client side in Sentry. | org.apache.sentry.provider.db.generic.SentryGenericProviderBackend | ||
sentry.cdap.policy.engine | Defines the Sentry Policy Engine for the cdap component. Must implement org.apache.sentry.policy.common.PolicyEngine |
(package name subject to change) sentry.cdap.instance.name | Defines the instance name for the cdap component. | cdap |
CDAP
These properties will be defined in cdap-security.xml
Property | Description | Default |
---|---|---|
security.authorization.enabled | Determines whether authorization should be enabled in CDAP. If false, a NoOpAuthorizer would be used for security.authorizer.class | false |
security.authorizer.class | Fully qualified class name of the authorizer class. Must implement the Authorizer interface | co.cask.cdap.security.authorization.DatasetBasedAuthorizer |
instance.name | Defines the instance name for the cdap component. | cdap |
Role Management
To support RBAC (Role Based Access Control) such as Apache Sentry we will need to support role management through CDAP.
...
Although supporting the Sentry Shell seems straightforward once the CDAP backend for Sentry is implemented, it's a relatively new feature added in Sentry 1.7 (SENTRY-749). CDH 5.5 ships Sentry 1.5 and there are no timelines on support for Sentry 1.7 (Cloudera Maven Repository).
After some digging we found out that SentryShell is hardcoded to use work with Hive and it works only with Hive. At the moment of this writing, Kafka is added support for SentryShell by making a copy for Hive's SentryShell. This seems to be the norm in Sentry for Shell support since there is no generic Shell which can be used by the services being integrated to Sentry. Unless we have some strong reason we should avoid having support for CDAP through SentryShell, specially since we are already working on supporting ACL management for CDAP in Sentry through Hue. See below.
For recognizing and listing CDAP entities in Hue, we will have to implement a CDAP Webapp for Hue. Hue is implemented entirely in Python using the Django framework. This integration is a risk for 3.4. More details on this TBD.
...